Green
Party of California
General Assembly
September 9th-10th, 2006
South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County
Proposal
for GPCA General Assembly, September 9th-10th, 2006
Subject: Review of Ballot Propositions by GPCA General Assembly
Sponsor (Name of Working Group or
Standing Committee):Campaign and Candidates Working
Group
Presenter (Name, address, phone number,
email): Warner Bloomberg, CCWG Coordinator, 867 North
Fifth Street, San Jose, CA 95112 (408-295-9353) wsb3attyca@aol.com
Subject (10 words or less): Review
of Ballot Propositions by GPCA General Assembly
Background and Purpose (100 words
or less; include relationship, reasons and/or justification to the GP): There
are two methods for the GPCA to take positions on statewide ballot propositions
-- by polling County Green Parties or
by action of the General Assembly. County polling is conducted by the
Coordinating Committee. Past practice has been for the CCWG to collect
reports on ballot measures which are circulated via the County Contacts email
list. If there are propositions which do not receive sufficient County
polling responses for the GPCA to take a position, those should be reconsidered
at the September 9-10th plenary.
Proposal (200
words or less): Reconsider
statewide ballot propositions to be voted upon in the November 2006 General
Election that did not receive enough votes by County Polling to establish
that the GPCA should support, oppose or have no position (i.e., lack of
quorum or less than 80%). Summaries of ballot measures and full text
links can be found via the Secretary of State website.
Committee Decision (Report if the
proposal had consensus of the committee; and/or what concerns were expressed): Because
of the July 15th deadline, this proposal had limited discussion by email. The
first CCWG teleconference since its June 25th plenary meetings will not be
until July 17th. Jo Chamberlain suggested ballot propositions be considered
by the General Assembly. Others affirmed that the County Polling
process had the potential to get more people aware of the initiatives and
involved
in the decision-making process.
Timeline: Receive
report on County Polling from the GPCA CC before the plenary. Present
brief summaries for a series of quick votes by delegates at the General Assembly
for unresolved ballot measures. Promptly report any results by email
on the County Contacts list and via GPCA website.
Resources (Personnel,
number and frequency of meetings, projected work hours, finances, etc. Permits/permission
needed? Application needed? Insurance required? Any bylaw/platorm conflicts?): One
hour of plenary time; possibly less depending on the number and type of
ballot measures where the GPCA position remains unresolved after County
Polling
(i.e., lack of quorum or less than 80% for support, oppose or no position
alternatives). Communication of positions, if any, by Media Committee
and GPCA webpage volunteers. Communication of GPCA positions by County
GP's.